Faithful 100%
Posted by rgoing on Mar 25th, 2007
The Judge likes a guy who says what he means and means what he says.
WALLACE: Do you want to overturn Roe vs. Wade?
THOMPSON: I think Roe vs. Wade was bad law and bad medical science. And the way to address that is through good judges. I don’t think the court ought to wake up one day and make new social policy for the country. It’s contrary to what it’s been the past 200 years.
We have a process in this country to do that. Judges shouldn’t be doing that. That’s what happened in that case. I think it was wrong.
March 26th, 2007 at 9:26 pm
[...] H/T to the Judge, Fred Thompson’s stand on Roe v. Wade: I think Roe vs. Wade was bad law and bad medical science. And the way to address that is through good judges. I don’t think the court ought to wake up one day and make new social policy for the country. It’s contrary to what it’s been the past 200 years. [...]
March 27th, 2007 at 7:25 am
I don’t understand how someone’s constitutional right to privacy could out weigh someone’s constitutional right to life.
Disect them, analyse them…the results will read “Homosapien / Human”…
and they were definately alive.
Roe v Wade….it’s a crock